What I Can Teach You About Laws

Tips for Process choke point Unfaireness in Andrew Phillips Cardflex

The government of the USA in 2013 made a new law that used its agencies to discourage the banks from engaging in business with the “high risk businesses” that were believed to be exploiting the consumers. The aim of this program was to make the businesses that were listed as the ones in the high risk of exploiting the consumer run out of business. This law lost its effect when it included a lot of legal businesses that were considered to be a scam to the consumers and that included the fire arms and ammunition.

Not only did the law affect the businesses alone, it also had some financial organizations like the Andrew Philips Cardflex cornered due to some allegations that they had done business with a listed company. The unfairness comes in when they are putting some very innocent lawful business people out of business and ruining their source of income. As was expected, this was met by a lot of resistance by congress who were trying to put an end to this “operation “until it was allegedly over.

The gun shops and other businesses were receiving notices from their respective banks that they will not be able to work with them. This was because the banks among many other businesses were forced to terminate long term relationships with these listed companies that they had no problem with. Companies like the Andrew Phillips Cardflex felt the heat when they had to go to court when they were claimed to have engaged in business with a listed company that led to a scam on the consumer’s credit and debit accounts. The ones in the business have been unfairly targeted and required to make other finance arrangements which lead to a lot of losses because it is not an easy process. So this shows that both the listed and the organizations that are doing business with them are a target. The losses due to restricted business relations are inevitable.

Andrew Phillips Cardflex law saw some businesses closing and others incurring massive losses if they do not end up in court. Anyone who has been in court will tell you that the financial burden that comes with them are usually unbearable. The program was ended last year but the businesses are yet to heal if not stop being targeted. The work of the government is to protect the citizens at all cost but that “all cost” should be limited up to where the law hurts other people. We should think of those people that depend on the businesses that were listed as “high risk” to feed their families. These kind of regulations should be eliminated because they go against the very core function of laws.